Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kumar Vishwas

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 13:05, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

=[[Kumar Vishwas]]=

:{{la|Kumar Vishwas}} ([{{fullurl:Kumar Vishwas|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kumar Vishwas}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Does not meet WP:BIO and no verifiable sources. Dloh cierekim 13:44, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Delete, notability not shown. I could change my mind if more reliable sources are added, however. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 02:57, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:59, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Delete, no references listed, significance of person listed not verifiable without references. --TylerPuetz (^talk/_contribs) 01:16, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:11, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:11, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
Comment He did get [http://cities.expressindia.com/fullstory.php?newsid=187335 an award], but I don't know how important this award is. I have a feeling more sources may be available in Hindi, the language he writes in. Hopefully a Hindi-speaking editor will help us out here.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:15, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

:Yes, if the article creator could provide us with reliable sources, it would be very helpful. Dloh cierekim 00:41, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TravellingCari 02:39, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

Neutral for now. These awards are unlikely to be covered by the mainstream English media in India. So additional reliable sources might be difficult. =Nichalp «Talk»= 18:21, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

Delete Non notable per Nom. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 21:59, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.