Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kurtis Lee Thomas

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC(talk) 04:13, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

=[[:Kurtis Lee Thomas]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|Kurtis Lee Thomas}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Kurtis_Lee_Thomas Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Kurtis Lee Thomas}})

completely and utterly non notable author. There is no coverage anywhere of this person that would meet a single N criteria here. Despite it only being three sentences, it reads like a PR puff piece Praxidicae (talk) 20:38, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom, another run-of-the-mill advertisement barely disguised as an article. Caro7200 (talk) 20:49, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:53, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 22:26, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 22:26, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

  • Delete a non-notable writer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:39, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Delete fails WP:NAUTHOR. The book was almost certainly not a "#1 best seller" as the article purports. Best, GPL93 (talk) 21:13, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.