Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kwayzar

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) —UY Scuti ^Talk 16:29, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

=[[Kwayzar]]=

:{{la|Kwayzar}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Kwayzar Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Kwayzar}})

Certainly questionably notable and improvable as none of the listed coverage, although some from notable sources, seem to solidly satisfy the applicable notability guidelines and the best my searches found were [http://www.ultimatemetal.com/forum/threads/rain-fell-within-breaks-up.45095/ this] (scpr.org), [https://www.google.com/search?tbm=bks&q=Kwayzar+Stanley+Hoffman+rapper+South+California#q=Kwayzar+Stanley+Hoffman+rapper+South+California&tbm=nws this] and [https://www.google.com/webhp?hl=en#hl=en&q=Kwayzar+Stanley+Hoffman+rapper+South+California this]. Notifying tagger {{U|Asarelah}}. SwisterTwister talk 05:37, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:38, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:38, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

:Well, if he satisfies the notability guidelines, then I have no problem with keeping the article. Removing AFD template. Asarelah (talk) 14:41, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:14, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:35, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

I would appreciate it if this were relisted a third time with hopes for better attention. SwisterTwister talk 07:12, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Weak delete. The sources merely confirm that he exists. Notability as a musician is not demonstrated, and for WP:GNG I would expect more than a few-line coverage.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:34, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Relisting comment: Per noms. request —UY Scuti ^Talk 18:37, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 18:37, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Keep Please Clean Up and Clarify.CalabJessika (talk) 09:33, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Keep Notable.The Cross Bearer (talk) 19:55, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Keep – The subject meets WP:BASIC. Source examples include, but are not limited to: {{cite web|url=http://mancave.cbslocal.com/2013/01/03/kwayzar-the-seer-is-83-and-he-can-still-do-it-better-than-you/|title=83-Year-Old Rapper “Can Still Do It” « Man Cave Daily|publisher=CBS News local}}, {{cite web|url=http://www.scpr.org/programs/offramp/2012/07/27/27620/kwayzar-an-84-year-old-rapper-whos-still-going-str/|title=Off-Ramp|author=|work=KPCC}}, [http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/83-year-old-rapper-kwayzar-virile-viral-article-1.1169634 "‘I Can Still Do It’: 83-year-old rapper Kwayzar is virile and viral"]. Daily News., {{cite web|url=http://www.stuff.co.nz/entertainment/music/7737779/83-year-old-rapper-I-Can-Still-Do-It|title=83-year-old rapper: 'I Can Still Do It'|work=Stuff}}, [https://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-16928658.html "Singers, writers stay young"]. Press-Telegram. {{paywall}} "Don't believe me? You can hear parts of the tracks at www.cdbaby.com/cd/kwayzar. Stan goes by the name of Kwayzar (his rap form of "quasar"), and if you log into the site, his fish-eye mug will stare back at...". North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:27, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.