Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lai Chun-kit

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Beeblebrox (talk) 01:57, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

=[[Lai Chun-kit]]=

{{ns:0|B}}

:{{la|Lai Chun-kit}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Lai Chun-kit}})

:({{Find sources|黎震傑}})

No coverage outside wiki mirrors that I can find. Fails notability test unless his position is automatic qualification as notable. JaGatalk 20:12, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

  • Not being able to find coverage may be because the correct search string isn't "Lai Chun-kit". It seems to be "黎震傑". This probably needs input from a Chinese speaker.—S Marshall T/C 20:36, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

:*Ha! Good point. If anyone can find sources, could they also add a ref or two to the article? As it stands it's an unreferenced BLP. --JaGatalk 21:13, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. cab (call) 02:04, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Delete The hits in Chinese are either from non-reliable sources or are trivial mentions in newspapers who ask him for a quote in an article on another topic [http://paper.wenweipo.com/2004/09/02/HK0409020043.htm][http://hk.news.yahoo.com/article/100728/3/jelm.html][http://www.singtao.com/archive/fullstory.asp?andor=or&year1=2004&month1=4&day1=1&year2=2004&month2=7&day2=10&category=g&id=20040415g03&keyword1=&keyword2=] but do not write any coverage of the man himself. His closest brush with notability appears to be a controversy from six years ago when he was denied permission to travel to Beijing [http://paper.wenweipo.com/2004/09/29/HK0409290037.htm][http://paper.wenweipo.com/2004/09/29/HK0409290037.htm], which got "news of the day" coverage when it happened, but no further media interest. cab (call) 02:04, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:37, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:23, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.