Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Landcruise
=[[Landcruise]]=
:{{la|Landcruise}} – (
:({{findsources|Landcruise}})
Delete. Unreferenced neologism, something made up, contested prod. WWGB (talk) 07:51, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. —WWGB (talk) 08:53, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Pity we have to waste our time with this. Polarpanda (talk) 11:42, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
- Delete - there are some references online to the expression "land cruise", referring to a tour by train, e.g. [http://mikes.railhistory.railfan.net/r084.html]. I can't find any evidence for the motorhome usage here, so delete per WP:NEO. MuffledThud (talk) 15:02, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
- Delete: Per WP:NEO. Joe Chill (talk) 17:17, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
- delete and Redirect as a {{tl|R from mispelling}} to Toyota Landcruiser. I don't see why the WWGB needs to delete a problem that was already fixed (ie, repurposed). And redirects are deleted at WP:RFD. 76.66.192.35 (talk) 07:43, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
:The article refers to a created verb "to landcruise". It is not related to a Toyota Landcruiser, misspelling or otherwise. WWGB (talk) 08:02, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
::It was nominated for deletion, so a WP:BOLD repurposing of the article name , since it is a mispelling of Landcruiser, fixes the problem of a bad article with a useful redirect. 76.66.192.35 (talk) 06:16, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.