Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lane v. Holder

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Lane v. Holder}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Lane v. Holder}})

Not notable: no significant, in-depth coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject. This was a gun/Second Amendment lawsuit in the U.S., but it never went anywhere; it was dismissed for lack of legal standing, so it was never adjudicated on the merits. It's not a significant or noteworthy precedent, and no coverage beyond routine. Neutrality^talk 22:14, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:31, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:59, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Non-notable, fails WP:GNG. Sal2100 (talk) 19:44, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so Soft Deletion is not an option.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:52, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Firearms-related deletion discussions. Sal2100 (talk) 21:41, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
• Delete. No indicia of encyclopedic notability. No indication that this has been widely cited by other cases, studied in law school textbooks, or meets any other criteria we might employ to determine notability of legal cases. BD2412 T 04:28, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.