Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lara Nabhan

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) ––User:FormalDude (talk) 02:46, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

=[[:Lara Nabhan]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Lara Nabhan}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Lara Nabhan}})

Doesn't seems notable journalist. ​​​​​​​𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️Let's Talk ! 16:16, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

:Keep While there is tabloid coverage about her appearance, she was also the subject of news when she was the victim of an assault:

:https://palsawa.com/post/157874/%D9%86%D9%82%D8%A7%D8%A8%D8%A9-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B5%D8%AD%D9%81%D9%8A%D9%8A%D9%86-%D8%AA%D8%AF%D9%8A%D9%86-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A7%D8%B9%D8%AA%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%A1-%D8%B9%D9%84%D9%89-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B5%D8%AD%D9%81%D9%8A%D8%A9-%D9%84%D8%A7%D8%B1%D8%A7-%D9%83%D9%86%D8%B9%D8%A7%D9%86

:Her health was the subject of news when she caught COVID https://yasour.org/2018/en/news/details/news-53407

:Her tweets made CNN Arabic news https://arabic.cnn.com/middle-east/article/2019/07/31/lebanon-mashrou-leila-concert-cancelled (not significant coverage)

:I cannot comment on the strength of the sources of the first two, but I've seen enough to think she is notbale. CT55555(talk) 02:38, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

::But Palsawa.com and Yasour.org are not a reliable source. ​​​​​​​𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️Let's Talk ! 10:42, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

:::Palsawa.com is the url. [https://www.facebook.com/sawanewsagency/ The Sawa News Agency] is the source of the first one.

:::Likewise Yasour.org is a url, we're talking about Ya Tire Social Cultural Media Group, which was [https://www.yasour.org/2022/ar/about founded in 2005]

:::I've searched WP:RSPSS and, unsurprisingly, it is silent on both. There is no consensus that they are either reliable or unreliable. I find that to the be norm for Arabic language news sources. It doesn't mean they are depreciated or bad, it's just normal for Wikipedia editors to assess English language and European language sources. So we need to make a judgement. As I said I cannot be certain of the strength of them. It seems obvious that they are weaker than The New York Times, but the google translate of the text seemed credible. If the content was controversial, I'd not use it for verifiability, but for the task of assessing of someone is notable, I consider them useful. CT55555(talk) 17:25, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

: Delete no notable program is mentioned which she presents. --2003:E0:F70F:B700:F8FD:5C18:53CD:652F (talk) 01:08, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

::There is no obligation to be affiliated with a notable program, only for the subject themselves to be notable. This is not a valid justification to delete. CT55555(talk) 00:01, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.