Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laris Gaiser

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton | Talk 01:12, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

=[[Laris Gaiser]]=

:{{la|Laris Gaiser}} – (View AfD)(View log)

:({{findsources|Laris Gaiser}})

Unreferenced, NN academic. Was deleted via prod, and undeleted yesterday at REFUND.-- Syrthiss (talk) 13:54, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

  • Delete for now. If Il Telescopio were a notable think tank (and it might be), then the founder would have a bit of notability as a result - but I'm seeing no evidence of that. So we have a claim of notability without RS to support. No objection to keeping if sources (and notability) become apparent, but I'm not seeing it there, or on my admittedly brief google search. UltraExactZZ Claims ~ Evidence 14:05, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete Fails WP:PROF, and Gnews hits are few, exclusively in a foreign language, and do not appear to be principally about him, so probably fails WP:BIO as well. Something weird is up with Gbooks. Like the previous editor, I'm open to changing my mind if somebody fluent in Slovenian actually finds substantial coverage. RayTalk 23:43, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 04:03, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete, insufficient evidence of notability, not surprising for an academic who is relatively young/junior. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 12:25, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.