Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Latvia–Uruguay relations

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SNOW. –Juliancolton | Talk 01:10, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

=[[Latvia–Uruguay relations]]=

:{{la|Latvia–Uruguay relations}} ([{{fullurl:Latvia–Uruguay relations|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Latvia–Uruguay relations}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Contested prod. Only rationale given was "Don't be crazy." More non-notable diplomatic relations. Countries don't have embassies. No reliable, secondary, independent sources. No indication of actual relations apart from just existing. Jd027 (talk) 16:36, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

  • Delete I looked for non-trivial mentions of the topic of Latvia-Uruguay relations in independent secondary sources and couldn't find anything. Yilloslime TC 16:57, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete. If there was something, anything worth mentioning, it might be a keep. Presently appears to merit maybe a sentence the relevant articles. Recognizance (talk) 18:37, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete They don't even have embassies with each other, and there is no "meat" or substance to the article to speak of. Not notable. ♪Tempo di Valse ♪ 20:26, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete Yuk! Another Groubani creation of X's relationship with Y. Latvia doesn't have an embassy in Uruguay. Uruguay doesn't have an embassy in Latvia. Maybe we can have an article about my relations with Michelle Obama. I've never met her, but I think we'd be good friends. Mandsford (talk) 20:52, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete Here we go again? WP:N issues. Pastor Theo (talk) 01:52, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete (A3) Article lacks substantive content. An agreement alone isn't enough to support a separate article. Actual actions need to have been taken in support of the supposed diplomatic relations for an article to be viable. - Mgm|(talk) 08:48, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete - Latvia has no embassy in Uruguay (which was one of the main points in the eventual deletion of Wp:Articles for deletion/Colombia–Estonia relations)? I can't see any other outcome, then: especially since Uruguay only has an honourary consulate (whatever that means) in Riga - with their main representation across the Baltic Sea in Sweden. DitzyNizzy (aka Jess)|(talk to me)|(What I've done) 09:12, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete - no real connection between these two; mere existence of diplomatic relations does not equate with notability, as well established by now. - Biruitorul Talk 15:15, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.