Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laurelle Mehus

:{{la|Laurelle Mehus}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Laurelle_Mehus Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Laurelle Mehus}})

No significant coverage in independent, reliable sources Does not appear to pass the General notability guideline. Theroadislong (talk) 13:29, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

• Comment: Note also that the subject of the article, who happens to also be the major contributor, has requested that the article should be deleted if she can't keep reverting it to her own version. JIP | Talk 14:03, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

:*Not sure why that is relevant here...Naraht (talk) 14:40, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

::*Depending on how this afd turns out, it could be relevant per WP:BIODEL. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 15:20, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

• Delete because 1. it does not meet WP:NACTOR and 2. out of respect for her wishes per WP:BIODEL. I was hoping to avoid a long drawn out ugly AFD with a prod on what I thought would be a fairly non-controversial article, but here we go. ~ ONUnicorn^{(Talk|Contribs)}problem solving 16:03, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
• Delete Unless something really great can be found in the sources currently listed as "Bibliography" in the article. Seems far from WP:NACTOR at this point. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 16:44, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
• Delete - It actually looks somewhat promotional, Meh if she wants it gone her wish is our command. –Davey2010^Talk 22:17, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:30, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:30, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:30, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

• delete The individual does not appear to meet the notability criteria for inclusion. PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 14:28, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
• Delete - doesn't have significant coverage in reliable sources as near as I can tell. Shame that this AfD was necessary; given the subject's wishes, it should have been an easy PROD deletion. --ThaddeusB (talk) 16:58, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
• :{{ping|ONUnicorn}} I just noticed you used BLP PROD. That is a special template only for unsourced articles, which is why it was removed. Next time use the regular PROD template, which is fine to use on BLPs too. --ThaddeusB (talk) 17:02, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
• Delete Played an unnamed hotel desk clerk in Pretty Woman and had another minor role. She's no Hector Elizondo. Fails WP:NACTOR. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 08:14, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.