Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lawrence Sebalu

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Lawrence Sebalu}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Lawrence Sebalu}})

2 cited sources, one is a blog and the other is unreachable. Yes, he may be the Minister of Finance, but I'm failing to find SIGCOV of this individual. All I can see is passing mentions. Probably not notable just like his successors. dxneo (talk) 00:35, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Politicians, Africa, and Uganda. dxneo (talk) 00:35, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
• Keep: Subject passes WP:NPOL as a finance minister, and a perfunctory Google search as well as a search on newspapers.com ([https://www-newspapers-com.wikipedialibrary.idm.oclc.org/search/results/?keyword=%22Lawrence+Sebalu%22]) shows quite a few sources which can be used to sustain an article (WP:NEXIST). Curbon7 (talk) 01:07, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

• Keep: Having sources unreachable is not a genuine reason. Subject is not the current but was a finance minister soon after independence which I hope in the days was notable. A quick Google search on books brings lots of recorded books, see [https://www.google.co.za/books/edition/Upc_and_National_Democratic_Liberation_i/J3bRCgAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=Lawrence+Sebalu&pg=PT165&printsec=frontcover here], [https://www.google.co.za/books/edition/Countries_of_the_World_and_Their_Leaders/YIlKAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=Lawrence+Sebalu&dq=Lawrence+Sebalu&printsec=frontcover here] and [https://www.google.co.za/books/edition/Religion_and_Politics_in_Uganda_1952_196/adkhAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=Lawrence+Sebalu&dq=Lawrence+Sebalu&printsec=frontcover here]. This shows that subject passes WP:GNG/WP:NPOL - Tumbuka Arch (talk) 01:22, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
• Withdraw the nomination: per recent article improvement. Word to {{U|Tumbuka Arch}}, I would suggest that next time if an article is moved to draftspace, it must not be moved back to mainspace without convincing improvements that it passes WP:NBIO as WP:BLP is a very delicate subject which requires strong sourcing. I couldn't verify the notability of the subject based on an unreachable source and blog source. dxneo (talk) 02:18, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
• :I concur with Dxneo here. I have cleaned-up the article and added to it significantly in terms of both prose and sourcing, but am generally not a big fan of cleaning up other people's messes. Curbon7 (talk) 03:34, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.