Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Layzie Bone discography

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Spartaz Humbug! 07:56, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

=[[:Layzie Bone discography]]=

:{{la|Layzie Bone discography}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Layzie_Bone_discography Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Layzie Bone discography}})

Seems superfluous, as Layzie Bone has a full discography (with links to all albums). Suggest re-conversion to redirect. - Not well versed in music/discography article conventions, so feel free to tell me otherwise. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 10:38, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! Babymissfortune 11:17, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! Babymissfortune 11:18, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

  • Keep. Not superfluous as has much more detail than the list of albums in the artist article. Given the sizes of the two articles, however, a merge would likely be in order. --Michig (talk) 12:03, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Merge Only one charting album, separate disco pages usually only get created to display chart information but there is not much to display here. Mattg82 (talk) 16:52, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:16, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:30, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 08:25, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

  • Keep but Improve - The nominator is correct that the article doesn't do much but repeat a list that is already in the artist's article, but since the artist is notable I suggest that his discography be expanded with the types of supporting info seen in other discog articles. A "cleanup-reorganize" tag could be added to the top. DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 18:52, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America1000 14:14, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

  • Keep but Improve He's part of one of the most successful rap groups in history. I think it needs to be cleaned up and improved. A deletion would be pointless as he is extremely notable. Dam!ta (talk) 23:44, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.