Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Le Quang Hung

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:23, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

=[[Le Quang Hung]]=

:{{la|Le Quang Hung}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Le_Quang_Hung Stats])

:({{Find sources|Le Quang Hung}})

Contested PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. PROD was contested on the grounds that he plays in the V-League, which is confirmed as not fully pro, making this insufficient for WP:NSPORT. Sir Sputnik (talk) 03:48, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 03:48, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

  • Comment I contested it because I'm uncomfortable with non-AFD deletion of someone who plays in his country's top league. Such a person is more likely than other footballers to get enough coverage to pass WP:GNG, so we should permit discussion before deleting. Nyttend (talk) 21:42, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Vietnam-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:51, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:51, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:51, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.