Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Learn direct (film)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 18:10, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

=[[Learn direct (film)]]=

:{{la|Learn direct (film)}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Learn_direct_(film) Stats])

:({{Find sources|Learn direct (film)}})

WP:TOOSOON and seemingly no WP:SIGCOV in regards to the lead up to the film's release. Mkdw ^talk 20:12, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:40, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

Delete. Other than this Wikipedia entry, I'm unable to find anything that discusses this movie in any context. This is just far too soon for an entry and odds are that as a student film, it will be unlikely to receive any coverage in the future. Most student films, regardless of their merit, go unnoticed for years unless someone involved in it makes it big. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:54, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
Delete lacks verifiability and feels of hoax. Of course, an indie or student film of extreme low budget might lack requisite coverage without actually being a hoax... but for this one, there is nothing at all... in RS or non-RS. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 22:34, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.