Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lee Burras

:{{la|Lee Burras}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Lee_Burras Stats])

:({{Find sources|Lee Burras}})

Fails WP:PROF. M. Caecilius (talk) 21:30, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

• Delete Fails WP:NOTE no evidence of notability of this particular individual. Amortias (T)(C) 21:38, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
• Delete No evidence is provided that he meets WP:ACADEMIC. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 22:09, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:07, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:07, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:07, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

• Delete -- no evidence of notability given. Sigh. there are good student projects on Wikipedia, honestly. but this isn't one of them. -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 05:24, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
• Delete. He seems to be an asset to his university, but that's different from being notable here. The [http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=7NttDlIAAAAJ citation record] isn't strong enough to convince me of a pass of WP:PROF#C1 and what else is there? —David Eppstein (talk) 04:28, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
• Delete. No sources either. Agricola44 (talk) 15:39, 13 May 2014 (UTC).

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.