Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lee Hall (lawyer)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:34, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

=[[Lee Hall (lawyer)]]=

:{{la|Lee Hall (lawyer)}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Lee_Hall_(lawyer) Stats])

:({{Find sources|Lee Hall (lawyer)}})

WP:BIO, WP:NOT - Notable? No valuable sources PeterWesco (talk) 15:58, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:55, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:55, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

Delete. Friends of Animals is notable but I don't think that being their legal director is enough on its own. I found some press stories quoting her in that role, but they said nothing nontrivial about her, so there is no sign of WP:GNG notability. Academic impact seems low, or maybe this is just an area that the tools I usually use to test that are bad at, but it doesn't matter, either way it means there's no evidence of notability there. And I can't find enough mainstream attention to her books for her to be notable that way. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:37, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:11, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

Delete - (1) Hall has not been a scholar or professor at Vermont Law School, contrary to the implication in the article; [http://www.vermontlaw.edu/News_and_Events/Events/Vermont_Law_Review_Symposium.htm she only spoke at a symposium there], and I find no evidence online that she taught as a tenured professor at Rutgers, the [http://catalogs.rutgers.edu/generated/nwk-law_0406/pg5535.html catalog listing her as an adjunct], thus the subject fails the professor test, and (2) also fails my test for notable lawyers. Perhaps the subject may become notable in the future, but is not yet there. Right now, this page is merely a resume of an up and coming lawyer. Bearian (talk) 17:46, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.