Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lee Hiller
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. SNOW closure. Enigmamsg 07:22, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
===Lee Hiller===
:{{la|Lee Hiller}} ([{{fullurl:Lee Hiller|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lee Hiller}}&action=delete}} delete]) –
NN autobio spam from a COI editor Triplestop x3 15:17, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
- Delete - an advice columnist that is not syndicated is not notable. Racepacket (talk) 17:05, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. I looked for reliable sources, and couldn't find anything outside of Herald de Paris, which doesn't even have an article on Wikipedia yet. See also Talk:Lee Hiller; {{User|LeeHiller}}, who created the article, said "I am currently writing book that I hope will be published in 2010". No bias against recreation, but currently non-notable. tedder (talk) 19:04, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. -- tedder (talk) 19:04, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- tedder (talk) 19:04, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Does not appear to meet WP:NOTE. As Teder said, no bias against recreation if notability is established. -Pete (talk) 19:51, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Doesn't appear to pass notability. Niteshift36 (talk) 15:50, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.