Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lee Ward
=[[Lee Ward]]=
:{{la|Lee Ward}} – (
:({{Find sources|Lee Ward}})
Non-notable, has not been the subject of any secondary sources. Graham Colm (talk) 18:56, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:32, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:32, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
- Weak delete. [http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/views/liverpool-columnists/echo-columnists/2008/09/19/dismal-record-of-a-costly-and-inefficient-council-100252-21854625/ This article] (the bit at the end, tacked onto an unrelated article) gives some nontrivial detail about Ward. With more like that, he might well pass WP:GNG. But one is not enough and that's all I could find. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:46, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Gongshow Talk 07:04, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. I can't find anything beyond trivial mentions in reliable sources. Falls short of WP:GNG and other more specific guidelines. --Batard0 (talk) 11:26, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.