Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Legends of Kesmai

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merged and redirected to Islands of Kesmai. Black Kite 08:05, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

=[[Legends of Kesmai]]=

{{ns:0|G}}

:{{la|Legends of Kesmai}} ([{{fullurl:Legends of Kesmai|wpReason={{urlencode:AfD discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Legends of Kesmai}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

No references. Nothing to indicate satisfaction of WP:N guidelines. [http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=%22Legends+of+Kesmai%22&hl=en&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-GB:official&hs=4oH&start=240&sa=N 229 relevant ghits] doesn't give much to pick from. Best I could find was an interview (with a developer?) [http://www.thecomputershow.com/computershow/interviews/legendsofkesmai.htm] but I'm not convinced about the reliability of the site. Marasmusine (talk) 11:06, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

  • Merge I suggest merging the article with Kesmai rather than deleting it. I honestly thinkg the merger of this article, GameStorm, and Island of Kesmai should all be merged into Kesmai. The Island of Kesmai article obvious can me trimmed down a lot to remove the garbage and then you could have a nice stub/starter article with Kesmai and have redirects of the related names to just the Kesmai article. -Jahnx (talk) 11:58, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Merge to Kesmai at worst. I found a lot of sources for Kesmai and cleaned up that article. There are many more. It would make a reasonable home for this stub, but it's not really fair to use the lack of Google hits as evidence for non-notability, since this game was from an era where not many reliable sources were available online. — brighterorange (talk) 13:00, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.