Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lego Cinematic Universe

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Eluchil404 (talk) 05:49, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

=[[Lego Cinematic Universe]]=

:{{la|Lego Cinematic Universe}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Lego_Cinematic_Universe Stats])

:({{Find sources|Lego Cinematic Universe}})

Posting on behalf of ProtoDrake. He says "The information is unreferenced and when I tried to reference it, I found the info was not even accurate or even true in some places. It reads like something from a fan site." Rcsprinter (gossip) @ 23:02, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

  • Delete I earlier tagged this as of dubious notability and nothing appears to have improved. Stuartyeates (talk) 23:09, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:36, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:36, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

  • Delete You have my support throughout. --ProtoDrake (talk) 08:35, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Delete with a raised eyebrow toward the title choice preventing any suggestion of a redirect. Any information about the "Lego Cinematic Universe" is already contained and nicely sourced at Lego#Films and television. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 05:33, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom and MichaelQSchmidt. "Lego Cinematic Universe" does not appear to be a legitimate term, unlike Marvel Cinematic Universe. Cliff Smith 19:50, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Delete per MichaelQSchmidt's reasoning. The name of the article does not appear to be a legitimate term. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 23:14, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Delete Mostly per per MichaelQSchmidt. Also, this seems kind of a hoax for me. — ΛΧΣ21™ 00:12, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.