Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leonardo Augusto Amaral Terra

:{{la|Leonardo Augusto Amaral Terra}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Leonardo_Augusto_Amaral_Terra Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Leonardo Augusto Amaral Terra}})

No indication that the subject meets WP:PROF or the GNG, which is unsurprising since he only received his doctorate last year. Joe Roe (talk) 12:35, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Joe Roe (talk) 12:35, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:38, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:38, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:38, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

• Keep I believe that winning the West Churchman Memorial Prize in 2014 is enough to meet criteria 2 at WP:PROF 2. The person has received a highly prestigious academic award or honor at a national or international level.. That said, the article needs expanding. -- HighKing⁺⁺ 17:41, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
• Do you have any more information on that award? I'm skeptical that an award first given out two years ago could really be considered "highly prestigious". Note that the detailed WP:PROF#C2 gives examples like the Nobel or Pullitzer, so we're not really considering the "£50 book token at a conference" tier here. Joe Roe (talk) 20:12, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
• It may be a language issue but Gnews reveals zero results for "West Churchman Memorial Prize," which suggests this recently created award does not enjoy the status required by WP:PROF. Delete. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:48, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
• Delete. Tiny GS cites. No evidence of notability. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:39, 28 November 2016 (UTC).
• Delete. Not listed as one of the top 25% of economists in Brazil [https://ideas.repec.org/top/top.brazil.html] so unlikely to pass WP:PROF#C1, and what appears to be a best-paper award isn't enough by itself for #C2. Beyond those possibilities, no other notability is evident. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:03, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
• Delete. only 1 of the 4 other recipients of the prize have articles. That's not proof of non-notability , but it does show that the prize does not make one conspicuously notable DGG ( talk ) 09:51, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.