Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lerumo

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete due to failing WP:V and WP:N. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 05:34, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

=[[:Lerumo]]=

:{{la|Lerumo}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Lerumo Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Lerumo}})

COI, spam, top google hit for "European Independent charts" is "Congrats to @iamlerumo" Snow delete would best here. Siuenti (씨유엔티) 08:24, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

:Also we should double-check that being signed to ADA music indicates significance, it looks like a vanity press kinda thing. Siuenti (씨유엔티) 08:28, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 May 26. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:34, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. So Why 09:52, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. So Why 09:52, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. So Why 09:58, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. So Why 10:00, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Comment Per my comment at my talk page, I admit that declining the speedy for being "signed" to ADA was a mistake but in the mean time sufficient claims of significance have been added to fail A7 regardless. Regards So Why 10:02, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
:What would they be? Are they credible? Siuenti (씨유엔티) 19:44, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
::That's why the article is listed here to discuss, is it not? Some of the references [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lerumo&diff=782340246&oldid=782287445 you removed with the comment "clean"] might be considered reliable sources, at least sufficiently so to err on the side of caution when it comes to A7. Regards So Why 08:52, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(T/C) 12:35, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Delete Nominator is correct, unsourced COI spam. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 15:28, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Comment I think it is, though common, wrong to remove references from an article at AfD. Let the community judge whether or not the ref's are reliable/suitable/adequate. Generally, things like youtube are not. The interview might be. Whether or not it is sufficiently in depth and reliable enough should be discussed here. Dlohcierekim (talk) 05:13, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.