Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Les Martin

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 01:13, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

=[[:Les Martin]]=

:{{la|Les Martin}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Les_Martin Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Les Martin}})

Unable to find significant coverage to meet GNG nor do I believe the writing of tie-in novels meet NAUTHOR. J04n(talk page) 15:40, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. J04n(talk page) 15:40, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. J04n(talk page) 15:40, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

Keep I have a two of his x-files books, he is a published author and should pass on WP:NAUTHOR. [https://www.amazon.co.uk/Les-Martin/e/B001ITYRLU books on amazon]. Govvy (talk) 21:34, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:41, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

Comment: @User:Govvy, please explain which criterion of WP:NAUTHOR is met. J04n(talk page) 12:58, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

reply {{reply|J04n}}, He is a published author, hmm, have they gone and changed NAUTHOR again? You use to qualify if you have published works. Govvy (talk) 13:48, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 06:00, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

Delete -- does not meet WP:NAUTHOR and significant RS coverage not found. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:42, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
Delete the article as it stands literally has no sources. We require coverage. Being a novelisationist/writer of books that are part of a large media franchise, is not the type of thing that makes someone default notable, and unless the books spawn the media franchise, instead of being part of a system that has already started and they are spawned by popularity elsewhere, meaning that the authors are not the originators of most of the intelectual content, the people writing them are probably not notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:23, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.