Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lesly Joseph

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mojo Hand (talk) 04:38, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

=[[Lesly Joseph]]=

:{{la|Lesly Joseph}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Lesly_Joseph Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Lesly Joseph}})

Heavily-biased biography whose author has a possible COI. Even if the subject is sufficiently notable, improvement of this article into an acceptable form seems to me to be highly unlikely. —Swpbtalk 22:06, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. —Swpbtalk 22:14, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. —Swpbtalk 22:14, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

  • Delete -- The subject seems to be a NN missionary in Paris. Being founder-president of what is probably a NN orgaisation cannot make him notable. If CFCC were notable, I would expect it to have its own article, so that I assume it is not. Peterkingiron (talk) 19:42, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
  • That's a good point. I can't say for sure that the organization isn't notable, but its notability would likely be a prerequisite for the notability of its founder. —Swpbtalk 22:19, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:42, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:42, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:42, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:43, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

  • Delete I don't see how this passes notability. --Jersey92 (talk) 00:01, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Delete. The whole article is unsourced claims (youtube vids and deezer are not WP:RS) and WP:OR. No credible claim of notability. Agricola44 (talk) 16:16, 27 October 2014 (UTC).

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.