Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Level Four English Words for the China Educational Department

:{{la|Level Four English Words for the China Educational Department}} – (View AfDView log){{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/reports/afd/{{urlencode:Level Four English Words for the China Educational Department}}.html|2=Afd statistics}}

:({{Find sources|Level Four English Words for the China Educational Department}})

What's going on here? Erpert (let's talk about it) 07:28, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

• Delete, looks like course-level details for one particular institution. Not nearly notable enough. JIP | Talk 09:26, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
• Delete.Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information.--resident (talk) 10:41, 21 November 2010 (UTC)'''
• Delete, No independent sources.--Johnsemlak (talk) 17:52, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
• Delete. Insufficient context and insufficient sourcing to justify an article. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 18:36, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
• Delete - original research, possibly disinformation. Bearian (talk) 19:42, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:42, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:42, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.