Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Levine Leichtman Capital Partners

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 16:40, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

=[[:Levine Leichtman Capital Partners]]=

:{{la|Levine Leichtman Capital Partners}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Levine_Leichtman_Capital_Partners Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Levine Leichtman Capital Partners}})

Fails WP:NCORP as written. No independent WP:RS. PROD contested by author. shoy (reactions) 17:55, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. shoy (reactions) 17:55, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

::Since the initial tag (12 October 2017), have added 3 RS (news organizations' articles that were non PR and non Opinion). Article created per The Private Equity WikiProject Task Force and seems to fit the criteria therein for Notability, in addition to WP:NCORP as I read it. Pegnawl (talk) 18:37, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

:::The problem with the third-party sources is the article is that they are all coverage of routine business activities (taken from press releases, for instance). See WP:CORPDEPTH. shoy (reactions) 19:00, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:22, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Delete References are not intellectually independent and/or relating to company announcements and routine business, therefore fails WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND. Topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP. -- HighKing⁺⁺ 18:18, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
Delete -- sourcing fails WP:CORPDEPTH and are mostly routine announcements. Private equity funds are rarely notable and this one misses the mark. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:16, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.