Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lexam VG Gold (2nd nomination)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Keeping in mind the result of the previous AfD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lexam, and the arguments put forward there which haven't changed, with so little discussion on this AfD, we can't reasonably say there is any consensus is this case. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 17:52, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

=[[Lexam VG Gold]]=

AfDs for this article:

{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lexam VG Gold}}

:{{la|Lexam VG Gold}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Lexam VG Gold}})

I have nominated this article for deletion because I don't think that it meets the notability guidelines. In particular, it lacks any depth of coverage. "Lexam VG Gold" is mentioned a lot on the net, but almost always in press releases or as part of a stock analysis. I couldn't find anything on the company in online newspapers. It's not even mentioned in the Timmins article (diff in case that should change), even though it's located in the Timmins Gold Camp, and the population of Timmins was only about 43,000 in 2006. TreacherousWays (talk) 18:07, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Delete, a junior mining company hoping to find a motherlode. Perhaps they will become notable one day, but they haven't done so yet. PK T(alk) 23:56, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:57, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:49, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bryce (talk | contribs) 09:38, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

::*Comment This company is so non-notable that it can't even inspire comments. TreacherousWays (talk) 16:42, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.