Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LibNi

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus that the article fails notability guidelines (particularly WP:GNG), additionally questions of spam (which would be a speedy criterion) were not evaluated as moot. j⚛e deckertalk 16:49, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

=[[LibNi]]=

:{{la|LibNi}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/LibNi Stats])

:({{Find sources|LibNi}})

Unremarkable product, self promotion. No indication of significance or widespread use. GimliDotNet (Speak to me,Stuff I've done) 10:05, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:37, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

  • Delete. Lacks reliable independent secondary sources to establish notability as required by WP:GNG. I've looked through the various Google searches and found nothing helpful. Msnicki (talk) 15:43, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
  • Delete or Redirect to the appropriate section of Linux, but I suspect deletion may be more appropriate. As above, I could find nothing useful on a search. Ubelowme (talk) 16:07, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 18:38, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

  • Delete Article does not establish notability after. I'm against deleting new articles for this reason, but the author and other editors have had a week to improve it. Rotorcowboy {{su|p=talk|b=contribs|fontsize=1.5ex}} 18:55, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
  • Delete per WP:COI and lack of WP:RS The [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=LibNi&action=history creator] of this article is the creator of this product and he's promoting it on wikipedia. --Artene50 (talk) 01:18, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
  • Delete - Spam, basically. No reliable sources. DreamGuy (talk) 22:37, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.