Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Libav

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to FFmpeg. History is preserved should someone desire a merge. There is consensus against a standalone and no relist is needed. Star Mississippi 15:37, 13 March 2025 (UTC)

=[[:Libav]]=

:{{la|1=Libav}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Libav}})

Does not meet the WP:GNG, I think a suitable merge target would be ffmpeg. I think it is somewhat compatible to the OpenWrt/LEDE situation where most developers of the fork eventually moved back to the original project. PhotographyEdits (talk) 12:55, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. PhotographyEdits (talk) 12:55, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
Merge with FFmpeg: Most of the coverage I'm seeing is about the forking; I'm not seeing much that covers Libav independently of FFmpeg. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 03:11, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
Delete - I cannot find sufficient coverage. Fails WP:GNG. Drushrush (talk) 19:23, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.