Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Libsys

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Darkwind (talk) 07:30, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

=[[:Libsys]]=

:{{la|Libsys}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Libsys Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Libsys}})

Usage of Predatory journal, dummy 'Economic Times' (returns 404 error) references and serves WP:PROMOTION WP:ADVERTISEMENT only ~ Amkgp 💬 09:38, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. ~ Amkgp 💬 09:38, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

Delete - Google News turns up nothing but blogs, name-drops, and blogs that name-drop the company (string: libsys), and the only references in the article are the company's own website and two whitepapers, of which I presume at least one of them is the mentioned predatory journal. —A little blue Bori v^_^v ^{2020's a bust; thanks SARS-CoV-2} 04:33, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:28, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

Delete, while the journal articles were promising, they are not available, so they can't be checked. The other sources are unreliable. --Ysangkok (talk) 23:04, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.