Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Life with ashley
=[[Life with ashley]]=
:{{la|Life with ashley}} ([{{fullurl:Life with ashley|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Life with ashley}}&action=delete}} delete]) –
Non-notable per WP:NFILMS and WP:GNG. Web search returns no reliable third-party links (just because a film has an imdb entry does not make it notable). SoSaysChappy (talk) 09:05, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 10:14, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
- Delete so many NFF violations of late, or are we just catching them more? Darrenhusted (talk) 11:03, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
- Keep This page seems relevant and some users seem to over-agressively police new posts. I do, however, think a stub tag should be added. Aliveatoms (talk) 18:04, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
- Delete: I can't find any reliable sources. Fails WP:NF. Iowateen (talk) 20:05, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
- Unless this is a) released and b) gets substantial coverage for it, it's non-notable. Delete Tony Fox (arf!) 20:29, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
- Delete, despite Aliveatoms's bad faith comments and non-policy "argument". No sources, no claims of notability, and, although it's listed at imdb, there's nothing that makes it meet the WP:NOTFILM criteria. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 20:47, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- Mattinbgn\talk 08:29, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
- Delete without prejudice and uderfy to author. The film will be screening at festivals in 2 months and may build acceptable notability. MichaelQSchmidt (talk) 03:19, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.