Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lil Tudor-Craig

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep, as notability has been established in the discussion below. I would also like to remind Flying Fische that their comment constitutes a personal attack and is not appreciated by the Wikipedia community. Deryck C. 11:06, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

=[[Lil Tudor-Craig]]=

:{{la|Lil Tudor-Craig}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Lil Tudor-Craig}})

There don't appear to be any significant WP:RS to support the notability of this individual as an artist or as anything else. GHits are dismal, and GNews brings up nothing at all, not even in the archives. Qworty (talk) 03:32, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

  • Keep Another utterly stupid nomination by a vandal. Flying Fische (talk) 17:05, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Keep: I think the first 2 sources used in the article ([http://www.churchtimes.co.uk/content.asp?id=51696][http://london-lantern.com/articles/default.asp?snID=&cssType=1&Issue=200802&ID=903], noting that the first is behind a paywall that I can't access, but WP:AGF on its content) are enough to satisfy the WP:GNG. -Atmoz (talk) 18:26, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 23:51, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 23:51, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

  • Keep While I will assume good faith on the part of the nominator, I do agree with Atmoz that these sources provide evidence of notability. Qrsdogg (talk) 16:26, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.