Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lillian G. Burry

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. JForget 02:45, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

=[[Lillian G. Burry]]=

:{{la|Lillian G. Burry}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lillian G. Burry}}|2=AfD statistics}})

:({{findsources|Lillian G. Burry}})

WP:NN local politician. Fails WP:POLITICIAN. Toddst1 (talk) 16:30, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:47, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:47, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
Keep, given the size of the county, the seniority of her position in it (equivalent to mayor of a city?) and the [http://news.google.com.au/archivesearch?q=Lillian+G.+Burry&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&hl=en&ned=au&btnG=Search+Archives extensiveness of coverage]. --Mkativerata (talk) 20:15, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

:So you're saying WP:POLITICIAN doesn't apply? Toddst1 (talk) 06:04, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

::No, the subject meets criterion 2. --Mkativerata (talk) 06:08, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Keep The link posted by Mkativerata finds mentions in the New York Times, the Washington Post, etc. Clearly passes the notability test. --MelanieN (talk) 01:14, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.