Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lillian Glass

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 14:58, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

=[[Lillian Glass]]=

:{{la|Lillian Glass}} – (View AfDView log){{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/reports/afd/{{urlencode:Lillian Glass}}.html|2=Afd statistics}}

:({{Find sources|Lillian Glass}})

Promotional article. All references provided link to blogs written by the subject, or only mention her in passing. —KuyaBriBriTalk 15:00, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

  • Keep Google search shows this person is notable. The challenge is sorting the good sources from the massive volume of promotional stuff and passing mentions. Better quality sources appear to be mostly paid sources. However, these are problems to be dealt with through good editing rather than deletion. Cullen328 (talk) 03:48, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 06:38, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
  • Keep per Cullen328, definitely notable. Article needs better sources and cleanup, but not deletion.--JayJasper (talk) 21:46, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:45, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

  • Speedy delete per Wikipedia:CSD#G11, "Pages that are exclusively promotional, and would need to be fundamentally rewritten to become encyclopedic." There is even a tag on the article right now that says so. This article is irremediably promotional and needs a rewrite from scratch by a non-WP:COI editor who cites relevant third-party sources.  Sandstein  08:32, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.