Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lin-ay sang Negros

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. There is no consensus here, but some sort of merge either from or into this article seems appropriate but no consensus here on exactly what action to be taken. Davewild (talk) 20:52, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

=[[Lin-ay sang Negros]]=

:{{la|Lin-ay sang Negros}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Lin-ay_sang_Negros Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Lin-ay sang Negros}})

Local pagent with only local references DGG ( talk ) 17:28, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

  • At minimum, merge, don't delete. As the article notes, the pageant is a part of the popular Panaad sa Negros Festival. Google and other searches turn up numerous mentions of the pageant in national media: a few examples are [http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-198177359.html][http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-98137289.html][http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-197876290.html], and there appear to be lots more. If we conclude that the pageant doesn't warrant a lengthy article listing all the winners, the pageant should be described in the article about the festival. Note also that we have a second page, Lin-ay sang Negros Awards, Contestants and Judges, which might also be added to this AfD. --Arxiloxos (talk) 18:41, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:53, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:53, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:53, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:10, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Esquivalience t 02:53, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.