Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lindner Ethics Complaint of the 83rd Minnesota Legislative Session

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep, but move to Arlon Lindner. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:07, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

=[[Lindner Ethics Complaint of the 83rd Minnesota Legislative Session]]=

:{{la|Lindner Ethics Complaint of the 83rd Minnesota Legislative Session}} – (View AfD)(View log)

This article is extremely crufty and could better be placed as a subsection in the articles of the two gentlemen involved in the controversy. Hemlock Martinis 07:24, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

  • move to Lindner There is no article about Lindner at the moment, and this would make a good start, with of course proper attention to POV. This would also be a less POV title: for the only article about him to have such a title is not good BLP. As a complaint about him it goes there. I'd move it now if it werent up or AfD. DGG 08:38, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Strong keep this article is about an event that played a major part in the political life of an active US Representative.--Wowaconia 09:19, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep - a well sourced if far too detailed article. Not appropriate renamed to Arlon Lindner as I'm sure that this issue would be a line or two in a bio at best. It's good to see US politics in action....from a very long distance- Peripitus (Talk) 09:40, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Move to Linder per DGG above. Elizmr 21:19, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.