Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lindsay Chaney

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 16:56, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

=[[:Lindsay Chaney]]=

:{{la|Lindsay Chaney}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Lindsay_Chaney Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Lindsay Chaney}})

Fails WP:GNG. The referenced book about the Hearsts, despite having been published by a "real" publisher, does not appear to have gained any significant coverage, and being a senior editor of Variety does not axiomatically confer noteworthiness. Julietdeltalima (talk) 20:20, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Julietdeltalima (talk) 20:20, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Julietdeltalima (talk) 20:20, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Julietdeltalima (talk) 20:20, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

Note that sources on a 1981 book and a mid-20th century journalism career will require archive searches.E.M.Gregory (talk) 22:53, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
WP:HEY I fleshed out a reliably-sourced page.E.M.Gregory (talk) 23:43, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, T. Canens (talk) 00:40, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:40, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

Keep passes WP:AUTHOR per reviows of book in the Los Angeles Times, Chicago Tribune, and Baltimore Sun that are now on the page.E.M.Gregory (talk) 13:06, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.