Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Line of succession to the former throne of Kutch

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC(talk) 12:45, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

=[[:Line of succession to the former throne of Kutch]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|Line of succession to the former throne of Kutch}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Line_of_succession_to_the_former_throne_of_Kutch Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Line of succession to the former throne of Kutch}})

This kingdom has been defunct since 1949. This completely unsourced article looks like unverifiable original research, including about the supposed royal status of living persons (WP:BLP). See also WP:NOTGENEALOGY. Compare Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Line of succession to the former Austro-Hungarian throne for a similar case. Norden1990 (talk) 10:16, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. Norden1990 (talk) 10:16, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Norden1990 (talk) 10:16, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

  • Delete per WP:DEL-REASON 6: {{tq|Articles that cannot possibly be attributed to reliable sources, including neologisms, original theories and conclusions, and articles that are themselves hoaxes (but not articles describing notable hoaxes)}}. It is impossible to attribute the current line of succession to this throne to WP:RELIABLE sources, because there is no current line of succession, because the princely state itself doesn't even exist anymore. TompaDompa (talk) 10:24, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Delete per WP:DEL-REASON 6. Nika2020 (talk) 18:10, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Delete and I suggest the same applies to all these lines of succession to former thrones, although we should retain notable pretenders. PatGallacher (talk) 18:32, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Delete. This article has had 8 edits since its creation in 2016: a small edit by its creator, a maintenance edit, two category editions, Guy removing deprecated sources, AnomieBOT, addition of CN tag, and nomination for deletion. People clearly are not looking for this content. JoelleJay (talk) 23:45, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Delete per all of the above Spiderone 14:11, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Delete: per all of the above Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 11:54, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.