Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lingolook

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. MBisanz ^talk 02:14, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

=[[Lingolook]]=

:{{la|Lingolook}} ([{{fullurl:Lingolook|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lingolook}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

In my vision, it appears to be a non-notable product. The article was previously deleted as spam; Google brings up over 800 results of "Lingolook Flashcards". I didn't see any news articles about this product, or any source that makes this article pass inclusion. I wasn't sure if this was actually notable enough, so I'm taking this to AfD. SF3 ^(talk!) 03:10, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Keep. Seems notable to me. The idea of producing a phrase book as flashcards seems to have attracted some attention, and the translation of this to an iPhone app some more still. Useful sources: [http://www.jaunted.com/story/2007/11/19/222953/00/travel/Just+One+Look:+Lingolook+Flashcards] [http://www.dailycandy.com/travel/article/32472/Speaking+in+Tongues] [http://gigaom.com/2008/06/09/the-new-iphone-is-apptastic/] [http://www.wandalust.com/50226711/travel_flashcards.php] [http://www.corporatemeetingsincentives-digital.com/cmincentives/200801/?pg=32] [http://www.uturnmag.com/car-rentals/travel-flashcards.html]. Yes, a couple of those sources call themselves blogs, but they are professionally edited blogs (i.e., magazine sites posing as blogs because blogs are more trendy these days), and so can be considered reliable sources. JulesH (talk) 13:49, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 00:28, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.