Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LiquidHub

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|LiquidHub}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=LiquidHub}})

Non notable business. Lacks independent coverage in reliable sources. Spam for just another corporation. duffbeerforme (talk) 14:06, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:28, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:28, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

• Delete: Searches find announcement-based coverage of financial deals, culminating in the February 2018 takeover of the firm, but these fall under trivial coverage at :WP:CORPDEPTH. I am seeing brief quotes from individuals associated with this company, but neither these nor the inclusion of their products in a couple of Forrester reports is sufficient to demonstrate attained notability. The :Capgemini page does not mention this acquisition; a partial merge and redirect may be undue attention to this particular takeover and rebrand. AllyD (talk) 10:02, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
• Redirect to Capgemini#History. I've added and sourced a reference there. Otherwise agree that standalone sourcing is insufficient. czar 21:16, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.