Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa Winning

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:38, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

=[[:Lisa Winning]]=

:{{la|1=Lisa Winning}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Lisa Winning}})

An orphan article and marked for notability concerns 5 years ago. Lacking WP:SIGCOV about her. Interviews where she is quoted talking about her product is not WP:SIGCOV about her. Possible self promotion. LibStar (talk) 03:39, 24 August 2023 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Women, and Australia. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:28, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
Delete The app or the company is potentially notable, but the individual doesn't seem to meet WP:NBASIC. MrsSnoozyTurtle 08:33, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion. Also, an editor recently added content including references to the article, an evaluation of sources would be helpful.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:46, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

Strong delete Purely promotional with primary sourcing and reads like a resume. sixtynine ^{• whaddya want? •} 18:09, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.