Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisandro Guarcax
=[[Lisandro Guarcax]]=
:{{la|Lisandro Guarcax}} – (
:({{Find sources|Lisandro Guarcax}})
Delete, appears to fail WP:GNG and mostly WP:ONEEVENT. Not finding any matches in google news http://www.google.com.hk/#q=Lisandro+Guarcax&hl=en&tbo=d&source=lnms&tbm=nws&sa=X&ei=LNfiUJ-6B7CZiQfTtYHACA&ved=0CAoQ_AUoAA&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.&bvm=bv.1355534169,d.aGc&fp=2dece4252898b4c4&bpcl=40096503&biw=1366&bih=540 Hell In A Bucket (talk) 12:33, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
:*That search only covers that last 30 days. You need a Google News archive search, as linked by the nomination procedure. Phil Bridger (talk) 23:41, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 18:05, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 18:05, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 18:05, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Guatemala-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 18:05, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
- Delete - Lacks reliable sources. fails WP:BLP--Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 21:37, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
- Comment. Plenty of GNews (archive) hits, in Spanish and (for some reason) Norwegian. Enough of them look reliable to suggest that if the individual isn't notable, his death may be. PWilkinson (talk) 16:15, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Theopolisme (talk) 22:45, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 23:07, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
- Redirect and Merge as a new section within the article Sololá titled "Death of Lisandro Guarcax", as his death does seem to meet notability criteria of being reported by secondary sources.—Baldy Bill (talk) 15:04, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.