Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Jeepney TV acquired programming

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=List of Jeepney TV acquired programming}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=List of Jeepney TV acquired programming}})

Fails NLIST and NOTDIRECTORY. Wikipedia is not a TV guide.  // Timothy :: talk  02:04, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

• Keep -- Clearly notable as a list. We have articles like this for dozens of networks. I know OTHERSTUFF isn't usually a winning AfD position, but in this case it is. If you disagree try nominating e.g. List of HBO original programming for deletion. Central and Adams (talk) 03:37, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television, Lists, and Philippines. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:16, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
• Delete. Per WP:NOTTVGUIDE. Programming lists are exclusively original programming, not acquired programming. Ajf773 (talk) 10:03, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
• :How does this apply to acquired programming but not original? It doesn't make the distinction at all. In fact it specifically excluded lists of historical programming, which is what this article is. Central and Adams (talk) 10:19, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
• Delete: Wikipedia isn't a TV guide, and the subject does not meet the WP:LISTN as the entries are not described as a group in secondary sources. Let'srun (talk) 14:58, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.