Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of My-HiMe Child and Elements
=[[List of My-HiMe Child and Elements]]=
:{{la|List of My-HiMe Child and Elements}} – (
:({{Find sources|List of My-HiMe Child and Elements}})
This does not establish notability independent of My-HiME through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of plot details better suited to Wikia. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, so extended coverage is unnecessary. TTN (talk) 19:39, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. --Calathan (talk) 21:01, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
KeepDelete We must keep this this is like the 42 of wikipedia! It is all so clear to me now. Or if you want to delete this based of of some boring accurate policies that's fine too I guess. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 21:07, 18 September 2013 (UTC)- Delete as non-notable. WP:NOT states that Wikipedia is not a collection of dictionary definitions or indiscriminate information, and that's what these glossary articles are. They should all be moved on to Wikia. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:08, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:53, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:53, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete - Pure unsourced fancruft. 'Nuff said. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 08:30, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.