Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Tampa Bay Buccaneers starting quarterbacks

:{{la|List of Tampa Bay Buccaneers starting quarterbacks}} ([{{fullurl:List of Tampa Bay Buccaneers starting quarterbacks|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Tampa Bay Buccaneers starting quarterbacks}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

• Delete indiscriminate information Mayalld (talk) 14:48, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
• Keep. You really do have to do a bit better than that with a nomination. It is uncited so far, and requires citations, but the list is of notable and verifiable players for a notable and verifiable team. I have no interest in American Football, but even I can see as a Brit that this list is not indiscriminate. The list has faults, yes, but it should be kept. I'm seriously tempted to suggest Speedy Keep. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 15:03, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
• Comment If you get rid of this one you will need to get the rest of them found at Template:NFLteamstartingquarterbacks. Spiesr (talk) 15:21, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
• Comment Actually no. Each article here is judged on its own merits, but I do see why you say that. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 15:25, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
• Keep I don't see what the big deal is, this is like the 10th team page I have made and nobody said anything on the other ones. I have even used the same template, whats the difference? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gilliganfanatic (talk • contribs)
• Comment I see your point, but may I suggest you concentrate on the reasons (eg notability, verifiability) why this article should be retained in your rationale for keeping the article. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 16:04, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
• Delete as the list version of over categorization. Stifle (talk) 17:40, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:58, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:58, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
• Keep Comment I really think it's just a handy list to have of all the teams quarterbacks. I have it for other teams, why is this one a problem. Eventually I was going to have it for all NFL teams, now I guess only about half of them will have a page of quarterbacks. All the quarterbacks started for the team, I do have the reference link. A majority of player articles use profootballreference.com. It is certainly a reliable website. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gilliganfanatic (talk • contribs) 20:55, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
• You already said keep once, further comments are still welcome though. Spiesr (talk) 17:56, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
• Weak keep Like the Bucs, I think that this 0 and 26 start has the potential to improve. Mandsford (talk) 23:02, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
• Keep List is essential and easy to maintain. --Mr Accountable (talk) 09:38, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
• Delete: Per Stifle. One man's essential is another man's freedom fighter . . . errr . . . --IvoShandor (talk) 11:58, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
• Weak Keep—NFL Quarterback comparisons are the subject of frequent coverage in the news, sports shows, sports magazines and so forth, and so the page can be readily made to satisfy WP:GNG. Likewise for the other pages on Lists of NFL starting quarterbacks.—RJH (talk) 23:21, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
• Keep Per Mr. Accountable.--Iamawesome800 Talk 15:51, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.