Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Windows Vista Compatible Programs

{{ns:0|T}}

:{{la|List of Windows Vista Compatible Programs}} – (View AfD)(View log)

Another unmaintainable list. There are many, many, many Vista compatible programs, and presumably there will be many, many more in the future. Crystallina 04:14, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

• Moderate delete per nom. Unmaintainable list. Bart133 ^{(t) (c)} 04:30, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Over time the list would grow incomprehendably long. If that is indeed a word. Calgary 04:35, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. In a few years this list could include, well, almost every program that comes out in that time. We already have a Category:Windows Vista, so this is unecessary. Someguy1221 05:47, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
• Strong Delete also per unmaintainable list. Wikipedia shouldnt become a software review site. Corpx 07:36, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
• Strong Delete per Calgary and Corpx. -- Magioladitis 07:46, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Connell66 07:56, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per all the above. Not to be uncreative in my rationale, though. --Haemo 08:17, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete unmaintainable, and getting moreso by the minute. Maybe as a category it wouldn't be so bad. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 08:52, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as listcruft.-h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 10:26, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
• Strong delete per WP:NOT. We aren't a software compatability guide. Arkyan • ^(talk) 15:06, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
• No-brainer delete Unmaintainable list, wikipedia is not an indiscriminate list of information --sumnjim ^{talk with me·changes} 18:17, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
• Strong delete There is no point for this article at all, I agree with all the above delete comments. Redrok84 19:17, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
• Snowball delete per WP:NOT. A true unmaintainable list. Carlosguitar 20:42, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletions. -- Bduke 00:22, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete It's impossible to maintain. More and more software are coming out which are Vista compatible, making the potential size of the list huge. Had it been restricted to software released pre-Vista release, it might have gone the other way.--Kylohk 10:55, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.