Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of artworks with contested provenance

=[[List of artworks with contested provenance]]=

:{{la|List of artworks with contested provenance}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_artworks_with_contested_provenance Stats])

:({{Find sources|List of artworks with contested provenance}})

This "list" has been around for over seven years, but still has only two entries and one reference. Zipvox (talk) 02:22, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

  • strong keep AFD is not cleanup, complete failure of WP:BEFORE of a notable topic with multiple books and articles written. I have expanded the list by a few items, and added several references. Additionally, nominator is a brand new SPI account who's sole purpose appears to be hounding me, all edits except one are to nominate articles I have created for merge or deletion. I am quite sure they are a sock of someone I have pissed off, but I do not know who. Gaijin42 (talk) 03:42, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:50, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:50, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

  • Speedy kept. See [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=562154157 further explanation]; this was not a good-faith nomination. Nyttend (talk) 20:11, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.