Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of current GMA Network contract artists

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 02:39, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

=[[:List of current GMA Network contract artists]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=List of current GMA Network contract artists}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=List of current GMA Network contract artists}})

Why Wikipedia needs an article like this? An article similar to this (List of current ABS-CBN contract artists and List of current TV5 (Philippine TV network) contract artists) does not exist. It is okay if its a talent management article like List of current Star Magic artists and List of current GMA Artist Center artists. No reason for this to be created. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 01:30, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 01:35, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

  • Delete - On Wikipedia No Requirements of This Article.Best Regards.---✨LazyManiik✨ 02:18, 28 October 2021 (UTC) {{small|Sockpuppet of blocked user {{np|Lazy Maniik}}. ✗plicit 14:15, 1 November 2021 (UTC)}}
  • Delete all, honestly. The vast majority of this article is sourced to GMA press releases, which is far from acceptable. The Star Magic article has ZERO sources and Artist Center has the same internal sourcing, so both articles need to go with this one. Nate • (chatter) 05:12, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete article with unreliable sources, as all citations come from GMA Network (non-independent = WP:NIS[!]). So the list article must be thrown into a wastebasket for good. So much problematic Philippine showbiz articles, this one just adds fuel to the already flaming problem. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:30, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete, Wikipedia is not a directory. Pikavoom (talk) 08:03, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete, WP:LISTCRUFT. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 09:54, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete There are no independent sources. LSGH (talk) (contributions) 02:50, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete, per WP:NOTDIRECTORY and WP:NOTDATABASE. --ERAMnc 16:54, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete Wikipedia is not a f'n directory. scope_creepTalk 14:12, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete Per WP:NOTDIRECTORY and all of the above comments. Newshunter12 (talk) 14:38, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete per WP:NOTDIRECTORY and WP:NOTADVERT. Lists of "current things" are inherently unstable and generally non-encyclopedic. Anyone needing this info can get it from the company's website, which we're currently mirroring. pburka (talk) 01:41, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.