Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of lawyers (2nd nomination)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete as G4. \ Backslash Forwardslash / {talk} 11:24, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

=[[List of lawyers]]=

AfDs for this article:

{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of lawyers}}

:{{la|List of lawyers}} ([{{fullurl:List of lawyers|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of lawyers (2nd nomination)}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Contested prod. I can't see that a list like this could be encyclopedic, and it's potentially never ending. Deadly∀ssassin 10:56, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Speedy delete WP:CSD#G4 - the names may be different in this list but the principle is exactly the same as in the previous deletion debate. No need to have the discussion all over again. JohnCD (talk) 10:58, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
Lawyers? Delete with extreme prejudice.... - But seriously, Delete, it is simply an indiscriminate list of unverified names that could go on forever. And Wikipedia is not a collector of indiscriminate information. Trevor Marron (talk) 11:03, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.