Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of locations used in Transformers: Prime

:{{la|List of locations used in Transformers: Prime}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_locations_used_in_Transformers:_Prime Stats])

:({{Find sources|List of locations used in Transformers: Prime}})

Entirely in-universe article. 89119 (talk) 08:10, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

• Speedy Keep The nomination is a blatant falsehood. The page starts out by explaining the real-world context of this information and the entries make repeated reference to real-world context, e.g. "the executive producers of the series", "It was first seen in "Darkness Rising, Part 4", "in the same episode". Warden (talk) 20:53, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 22:45, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 22:45, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

• Delete Entirely in-universe or not, this is just indiscriminate, trivial information inherently undeserving of an encyclopedia entry. Absolutely no real world significance except for die hard fans. Some Transformers wiki would love to have this, I'm sure, but there's no reason for it here. DreamGuy (talk) 22:24, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
• Yeah, that was basically the reason why I nominated this article for deletion, haha. I'm a die-hard fan of Transformers too, and in fact this is my second-favorite Transformers series (my first one is Transformers: Animated). But the article has like no references and only like 5% (my wild guess) of the prose is actually not in-universe material. So this article appears to be a hopeless mess. 89119 (talk) 00:03, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:30, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

• Delete Most of these locations are trivial buildings, facilities and ships. Obviously, a story has to take place somewhere, but do we really need to name and list these locations in such detail? No. Name the locations where they are relevant to the plot, or you should provide the designing and production aspects of the locations (WP:WAF), which I presume to not exist for an encyclopedic article expansion. – sgeureka ^t•c 08:16, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
• Delete some sources to verify existence of these fictional locations, but nothing to WP:verify notability. In other words, we need WP:SIGCOV or significant coverage to meet the GNG. Nothing against mentioning the locations in an article about the series. But a separate article with this level of detail isn't supported by the sources, and breaks into WP:NOTPLOT territory with the lack of out-of-universe context. Shooterwalker (talk) 19:09, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
• Delete appears to be an indiscriminate collection of trivia. OSborn ^arf_contribs. 00:30, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.